Comparative study of the Italian method and that of the National Risk Management Secretariat to obtain the seismic vulnerability index of the dwellings - Riobamba, Chimborazo case

Authors

  • David Alejandro López Niama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53632/incitec.v1i2.97

Keywords:

risk, earthquake, vulnerability, housing

Abstract

Riobamba is located in an area of high seismic risk, therefore there is a need to carry out a study on the seismic vulnerability of homes, which focuses especially on the La Victoria and Miraflores neighborhoods within this city. The factors that contribute to a home being vulnerable are: poor configuration, lack of structure, poor foundations, discontinuity of elements, uncontrolled extensions and reductions, unskilled labor and the lack of adequate technical direction. Through this research work, the seismic vulnerability indices were evaluated in 34 homes in the Miraflores neighborhood and 52 in the La Victoria neighborhood, using two methodologies: the Italian Method and the Method of the National Secretariat for Risk Management (SNGR). Using the SNGR method in the study neighborhoods, 100% of homes with low vulnerability have been reported, that is, they are safe since the evaluation basically
only relates to the state of conservation, which generates little reliability in the method. On the other hand, with the Italian method, his analysis focuses on the structural behavior of the entire dwelling, resulting in 7% of safe dwellings, 90% corresponds to dwellings with medium vulnerability and 3% represents highly vulnerable dwellings. Therefore, the best option for vulnerability analysis is the Italian methodology as it generates results that can be trusted and taken into consideration for a correct seismic evaluation of homes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Egred , El terremoto de Riobamba, Quito: Producciones digitales AbyaYala, 2000.
[2] S. H, «Vulnerability and risk analysis for individual structures and systems.,» de Proceeding of the Eigut European Conferences on Earthquake Engineering,
Lisboa, SEECE Vol.7, 1986.
[3] Ministerio de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda, «Guía Práctica para evaluación sísmica y rehabiitación de estructuras, de conformidad con la Norma Ecuatoriana de la Construcción NEC 2015,» Quito, Activa, 2016, p. 15.
[4] A. C. d. I. Sísmica, «Manual de Construcción, evaluación y Rehabilitación sismoresistente de viviendas de mampostería,» 15 06 2012. [En línea]. Available: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/7661_ManualdecasasdemamposteriaAISredpart1.pdf. [Último acceso: 12 05 2018].
[5] A. M. &. K. H., «What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?,» Ingeniería
Análisis de Fallas, vol. 14, nº 1, pp. 1-22, 2007.
[6] A. Roberto, Evaluación Rápida de la vulnerabilidad sísmica en edificios de Hormigón Armado, Quito, 2006.
[7] P. José, «Evaluación de la construcción informal de edificaciones en zonas urbano marginales de la ciudad de Riobamba,» de Tesis de pregrado de Ingeniería Civil, Riobamba, 2010.

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
D. A. López Niama, “Comparative study of the Italian method and that of the National Risk Management Secretariat to obtain the seismic vulnerability index of the dwellings - Riobamba, Chimborazo case”, INCITEC, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 32–37, Jun. 2021.

Issue

Section

Original Article